synexasMATRIX
Request a demo
ENERGY, CONSTRUCTION & MANUFACTURING WALKTHROUGH

From photos, plans and orders
to work your engineers can check.

Three apps, each built around one job: checking blade photos, reviewing site plans and planning delivery dates. AI agents show their evidence; your engineers decide.

A generated photograph of offshore wind turbines standing in a calm, sunlit blue sea

Three appsWho decides, at every stepPublished sources linked

Follow three apps. Each shows the AI agents at each step, what they could not judge and who decides.

  1. 01 / Asset inspectionCheck every blade photo.
    Send unclear ones to an engineer.
    Flag damage in drone photos of blades and send findings and unclear photos to an engineer.
  2. 02 / Drawings & codesCheck the plan.
    Leave the approval to the reviewer.
    Check a site plan against your code library, rule by rule.
  3. 03 / Orders & planningPromise dates you can keep.
    Name the missing data.
    Propose delivery dates from ERP exports and name the missing data.

01 / 03Asset inspection

Check every blade photo.
Send unclear ones to an engineer.

Workflow scope

The recurring work

After each drone flight, a few specialists sort hundreds of blade photos to decide which damage needs a crew. Small damage is easy to miss.

Inputs to scope

  • Drone photos from each flight
  • Your damage types and severity scale
  • Earlier findings for each turbine

What we would configure

A workflow in steps, each with its own model: flag possible damage, outline it, check its depth against dirt or shadow and draft a finding with the evidence. Synexas built an app like this for an offshore wind manufacturer.

The blade photo is generated.

Deliverable, decision & acceptance

The deliverable

A finding with its evidence for each photo that may show damage, and a list of photos the app could not judge.

Your decision point

A blade engineer confirms each finding and decides whether a crew goes out. The app orders no repair.

How we would accept it

Your engineers test it on photos they have already judged and confirm that every unclear photo reached an engineer.

02 / 03Drawings & codes

Check the plan.
Leave the approval to the reviewer.

Workflow scope

The recurring work

Reviewers check each drawing against dozens of code clauses by hand. An item that is simply not drawn is the easiest to miss.

Inputs to scope

  • Site plan or drawing set
  • Your code library and checklist
  • Design notes and earlier comments

What we would configure

A read-only workflow that turns your code library into checkable rules, measures and counts what it can on the plan and lists each rule as met, a finding or unclear.

Deliverable, decision & acceptance

The deliverable

A findings list with each rule, its clause and where it applies on the plan.

Your decision point

The plan reviewer checks each finding and decides what goes back to the designer. The app approves no drawing.

How we would accept it

Run it on plans your reviewers have already checked and log every rule it marked unclear.

03 / 03Orders & planning

Promise dates you can keep.
Name the missing data.

Workflow scope

The recurring work

Planners piece together orders, materials, stock and lead times from several screens before they promise a date. A missing lead time often surfaces too late.

Inputs to scope

  • Open order lines from your ERP
  • Bills of materials and routings
  • Stock and purchase lead times

What we would configure

A workflow beside your ERP that reads its exports, checks materials and line capacity, proposes dates and lists the lines it cannot plan. It changes nothing in the ERP.

Deliverable, decision & acceptance

The deliverable

Each order line with a proposed date or the data it is missing, and a file for the ERP once a planner confirms.

Your decision point

The production planner confirms each date before it reaches the ERP or a customer. The app sends no date.

How we would accept it

Compare its dates with the planners’ own on past orders and check that every missing item was listed.

YOUR SYSTEMS

Your existing systems
remain the starting point.

Scope the first app around authorized exports from your inspection, drawing and ERP systems. Native connectors and write-back are separate deliverables to agree.

SOURCES

Sources
for these tasks.

These sources inform the workflow design, responsibilities and acceptance questions. Your own law, codes and procedures decide what applies, and each deployment is agreed and checked with your team.

  1. OSHA: Green Job Hazards, Wind Energy

    Federal guidance. Hazards in wind energy work, such as falls, electrical shock and fire.

  2. ICC: 2021 International Fire Code, Chapter 5

    Model code. Fire service features such as fire apparatus access roads; each state or city adopts its own edition.

  3. Justice Department: 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design

    Federal standard. Accessibility requirements for new and altered facilities, including parking, entrances and ramps.

  4. NIST: Cybersecurity Framework Manufacturing Profile

    Voluntary framework. Cybersecurity outcomes for manufacturing systems and the production data they hold.

  5. NIST: AI Risk Management Framework

    Voluntary framework. How organizations can govern and manage the risks of AI systems.

Let’s make AI useful.
For your actual work.

Tell us about a job your team repeats, not your confidential files. We’ll show you how Matrix handles work like it.

Request a demo
DOWNLOAD

Security brief

Tell us where to send it.